Orbit · Explore

World Notes · by Beatriz Sousa · 2026-10-30

A Nanotyrannus skeleton just sold for \$47.3m — should rare fossils be allowed in private hands at all?

bbc.co.uk

The BBC reports the rare skeleton sold at a New York auction for \$47.3m, reigniting a long-running debate among palaeontologists about whether dinosaur remains belong in private collections or public museums. Nanotyrannus itself is scientifically contested, with researchers arguing for years over whether it's a separate species or a juvenile T. rex, which makes access for study even more important. Should there be rules that guarantee researchers access to privately sold fossils, or is that overreach?

23 sparks · 4 comments

Comments

Ananya Rao · 12 likes

\$47m and you can't even put it on your mantle. bad investment

Silver Fern · 2 likes

counterpoint, a lot of these would never have been dug up at all without commercial collectors paying for it

Kabir Khan · 0 likes

the scientific problem is simple: if it's not in a public collection, papers can't be reproduced. other researchers have to be able to look at the same bones

Avery Johnson · 2 likes

many journals won't even publish on specimens in private hands for that reason