Comments
Chinedu Adeyemi · 18 likes
The middle path is probably best: try it cheaply, keep notes and decide after you have real evidence. My only addition is to make the first step visible.
Pixel Rider · 11 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. It reminds me of a very specific conversation near a coworking table.
Midnight Fern · 9 likes
I am cheering for this update. The the kitchen detail changes the whole answer. Glad you shared the messy version too.
Ngozi Bello · 7 likes
The middle path is probably best: try it cheaply, keep notes and decide after you have real evidence. It reminds me of a very specific conversation near the corner shop.
Lucas Silva · 6 likes
This is genuinely helpful, thanks for writing it out. The Kuala Lumpur example makes it feel concrete.
Aisha Jacobs · 6 likes
I agree with the goal and disagree with the method. This would have saved me a lot of trial and error.
Cozy Sparrow · 5 likes
Yes, but I would approach it in a small, testable way rather than trying to solve everything at once. You will learn more from a simple version repeated three times than from a perfect plan you never start.
- Start small and make the next step obvious.
- Keep notes so you can compare what worked.
- Ask someone with recent experience, not just strong opinions.
Hope this helps!
Olena Shevchenko · 68 likes
That sounds great until you add children/pets/deadlines.
Priya Nair · 2 likes
I am curious what changed your mind.
Priya Nair · 1 likes
Small caveat: context changes the answer a lot.
Isha Menon · 0 likes
This is the kind of disagreement I like.
Rafael Almeida · 3 likes
The context helps. Without it I would have assumed the opposite. For me it came down to the route. Glad you shared the messy version too.
Daniel Kiptoo · 2 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. I keep a note about learning for exactly this reason.
Lukas Huber · 2 likes
Small caveat: context changes the answer a lot.
Priya Nair · 1 likes
I needed the reminder to start smaller.
Ethan Brooks · 2 likes
I would ask what outcome you want in two weeks, not in some ideal future. That makes the choice much clearer. My only addition is to make the first step visible.
Kabir Khan · 2 likes
The middle path is probably best: try it cheaply, keep notes and decide after you have real evidence. The a family dinner detail changes the whole answer.
Emma Tremblay · 2 likes
The middle path is probably best: try it cheaply, keep notes and decide after you have real evidence. I am curious whether explainers still feels good next month.
Tola Ibrahim · 2 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. That is the kind of detail beginners miss.
Laura Gómez · 1 likes
Yes, but I would approach it in a small, testable way rather than trying to solve everything at once. You will learn more from a simple version repeated three times than from a perfect plan you never start.
- Start small and make the next step obvious.
- Keep notes so you can compare what worked.
- Ask someone with recent experience, not just strong opinions.
That should give you a solid first pass.
Ren Suzuki · 1 likes
I think both things can be true.
Grace Parker · 1 likes
I would ask what outcome you want in two weeks, not in some ideal future. That makes the choice much clearer. This pairs weirdly well with lentil soup.
Ethan Brooks · 1 likes
That is a surprisingly elegant way to frame it. I noticed the same thing in Lisbon. Small progress still counts.
Rapid Otter · 1 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. This is more useful on a tired winter than on a perfect day.
Arif Hasan · 1 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. This would have saved me a lot of trial and error.
Mariana Costa · 14 likes
@coderRunner2 Thanks, that actually helped.
Avery Johnson · 1 likes
I disagree a bit. money matters, but the bigger issue is usually expectations. I learned that one the expensive way.
Chinedu Adeyemi · 1 likes
This feels a little overrated to me, even if the intention is good. The Manila example makes it feel concrete.
Gentle Baker · 1 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. It sounds small, but the playlist matters.
Valeria Flores · 1 likes
I would ask what outcome you want in two weeks, not in some ideal future. That makes the choice much clearer. I would write it down before changing anything else.
Lucía García · 1 likes
The middle path is probably best: try it cheaply, keep notes and decide after you have real evidence. It sounds small, but the practice run matters.
Rohan Mehta · 1 likes
I would ask what outcome you want in two weeks, not in some ideal future. That makes the choice much clearer. The low-effort version is probably the keeper.
Priya Nair · 0 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. The surprising constraint is probably the real story.
Priya Nair · 17 likes
Exactly; the hidden cost is energy.
Rapid Otter · 0 likes
The best answer in the thread, honestly.
Noah Campbell · 0 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. That is where the boring checklist helps.
Urban Fern · 0 likes
The middle path is probably best: try it cheaply, keep notes and decide after you have real evidence. I would test it for 4 days before deciding.
Maya Williams · 0 likes
My practical advice is to make the next step tiny enough that you can do it today. Momentum usually answers half the question. My only addition is to make the first step visible.